I admit, many items that cross my itorio escr not get my attention beyond the abstract diagonal and a brief reading of the findings. Curious
the existence of such abstracts that lead the articles. In 250-400 words explain briefly about the topic, rationale, theories and m ETHODOLOGY the article. Some even advance you some conclusion based on the results. I've always hated spoilers, and I shall explain why.
Like all once, I did that. Lame article, I read the abstract, a look at the graphs, a couple of rehearsals to conclusions and passing the next. Do not do it.
should be beating about the eye, there can be something and n the world more dangerous than an abstract . Especially good abstract. It promises gold and m gold captivates you with its fine words and its ambitious results. If you do not get the item and can only read the abstract , you keep wanting more, believing you that the thesis is going to hell because that article I had come from fine china jewelry.
Nothing is further from reality. In many cases, these summaries are to be a powerpoint advertising agency, a lawyer combed card, embellished presentation that has no more purpose than to enter through the eyes of some doctors no time to read and very complete bibliography. They are the great lie of research (Especially in social sciences). Last week, without going any further, I read four articles whose abstracts were brilliant, but after a closer reading, texts became not stand for anything. Bullshit. But hey, what a great title and what it redactao summarized.
So I said to myself: "If you can not beat them, join them." And one afternoon I have borne an abstract . Hour and a half formulating and reformulating phrases in just 400 words a reviewer across the world falls in love with the wonderful article that hide. Or rather, to hide. For, indeed, the abstract is done, but the article does not! If I accept it, and think of what I do. But I removed it bailao, no?
the existence of such abstracts that lead the articles. In 250-400 words explain briefly about the topic, rationale, theories and m ETHODOLOGY the article. Some even advance you some conclusion based on the results. I've always hated spoilers, and I shall explain why.
Like all once, I did that. Lame article, I read the abstract, a look at the graphs, a couple of rehearsals to conclusions and passing the next. Do not do it.
should be beating about the eye, there can be something and n the world more dangerous than an abstract . Especially good abstract. It promises gold and m gold captivates you with its fine words and its ambitious results. If you do not get the item and can only read the abstract , you keep wanting more, believing you that the thesis is going to hell because that article I had come from fine china jewelry.
Nothing is further from reality. In many cases, these summaries are to be a powerpoint advertising agency, a lawyer combed card, embellished presentation that has no more purpose than to enter through the eyes of some doctors no time to read and very complete bibliography. They are the great lie of research (Especially in social sciences). Last week, without going any further, I read four articles whose abstracts were brilliant, but after a closer reading, texts became not stand for anything. Bullshit. But hey, what a great title and what it redactao summarized.
So I said to myself: "If you can not beat them, join them." And one afternoon I have borne an abstract . Hour and a half formulating and reformulating phrases in just 400 words a reviewer across the world falls in love with the wonderful article that hide. Or rather, to hide. For, indeed, the abstract is done, but the article does not! If I accept it, and think of what I do. But I removed it bailao, no?
0 comments:
Post a Comment